Council has accepted a settlement offer:

Screen Shot 2018-12-19 at 11.25.31 AM.png

Screen Shot 2018-12-19 at 11.26.19 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-12-19 at 11.26.27 AM.png


http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2019.CC1.18
 
Last edited:
Site Plan application submitted:

app.toronto.ca

Application Information Centre

Search for details about current planning applications and Minor variance and Consent applications. Application Information Centre For best results, please use the latest version of Microsoft IE/Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. The Application Information Centre allows you to: Search by...
app.toronto.ca app.toronto.ca
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMT
This is a better rendering than the last one creating that antique modern feel ! I love the rounded corners with the antique molding on top with columns and pane glass look for the windows etc .
 
Northern Light said:
This one has some amendments to it, via a settlement offer intended as an amicable jointly supportable submission to the OLT coming to next week's Council meeting.

The report is here: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174158.pdf

From said report, a table comparing the various iterations:


View attachment 368163

There is also a link to new architectural plans submitted in June:


From that attachment:

View attachment 368165

View attachment 368169

View attachment 368170
View attachment 368173
View attachment 368175

View attachment 368176
Click to expand...
Not like this is a new complaint, but… six and a half years to get approval?! It's simply insane how long it takes projects, even relatively modest ones like this, to get approved. Here, one storey has been lopped off the building, but the building itself is 6.6% larger. What has been gained over so many years? This should have been built and occupied by now.

42
 
www.toronto.ca

Application Details

www.toronto.ca www.toronto.ca

Movement here in the form of a Minor Variance boost. (NOAC had been issued in 2022 with no permit activity.) Changes are as follows:
  • Storeys increased from 9 to 12
  • Height increased from 35.5 to 44.8m
  • Total residential units increased from 165 to 240
  • Total vehicular parking decreased from 175 to 105
  • Total bicycle parking increased from 186 to 248
Updated elevations below:

South (Glencairn frontage):
PLN-CA Plans - REVISED plan- 18 March-21.jpg


West (Bathurst frontage):
PLN-CA Plans - REVISED plan- 18 March-18.jpg


North:
PLN-CA Plans - REVISED plan- 18 March-24.jpg


East:
PLN-CA Plans - REVISED plan- 18 March-26.jpg


CoA hearing scheduled for April 17
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top