Wow that streetscape is absolutely dreadful and appallingly bad in every way imaginable, to the point of being disgusting.

The tower itself is forgettable and nothing to write home about
 
Site Plan has been filed on this one.........seems odd to me to bother, at this point.........but its not my money...


@Paclo

There apparently have been at least some minor changes since the ZBA filing (based on the Cover Letter), but I don't see any itemized list.

Render quality is certainly high enough, LOL....

This first one I have taken down to 20% so @3Dementia will want to d/l his own if Paclo doesn't post a full size one in the DB:

View attachment 617600

Below is at 30%

View attachment 617601

And now a mere 10%

View attachment 617602

No notable stat changes from the ZBA application
 
This one was at Council in June with a Settlement Offer.

That offer is now public:


Height drops to 54s

From the above:

1752005168990.png

1752005196848.png

1752005236117.png

1752005272655.png

1752005292699.png


Arch. Drawings:


No renders, the elevation drawings are sideways...............sigh....so @Paclo can bring those forward.
 
Updated elevations & ground floor plan of the settlement design:
backgroundfile-256381-11.jpg

backgroundfile-256381-12.jpg

backgroundfile-256381-01.jpg


Read our front page article for details on the recent settlements:
 
Leave it up to perennial fiscal tightwads Diamond Corp. to not follow the hopeful new trend in T.O. & stick with outmoded obsolete boring grey. Good job.
 

Back
Top