Incredibly funny that house between Keele station and the current strip mall will continued to be marooned lmao
 
Still hate how that money mart just sits right next to the station. Ignoring how scummy its practices are, it wastes extremely valuable land. Same for that random crack shack next to the 7-eleven.
I've always thought that house would be the perfect university rental/party house. No neighbours and the constant idling of diesel buses and clanking of the elevated subways to cover noise, would not have to worry about 311 calls 🤣
 
Asked the arch firm behind the development about any public-facing plans for the building itself. Seen their prior work and I'm optimistic this'll turn out nice. I'll get back to the thread later with any pics if possible.
 
New render looks SHIIIIIIITTTTT. Its like somebody frankensteined that one tower with the italian resturant on high park and a generic white monolith. That better be changed up in the permit process.
 
Submission is in but not yet posted:
Is there any chance at all the architecture of the site will change? I got no issues with the idea of a tower of such size in the lot, but maaaaaaaaan it’s ugly. Despite my love of urban planning I haven’t gotten a good understanding of the application process.
 
Submission is in but not yet posted:

Renderings from the application:

1756945141217.png


1756945165880.png


1756945176393.png
 
Why are there five different cladding designs in the first eight storeys?

Agreed this is excessive, to be charitable.

But for others, I think its important to highlight why RAW has done this.........

The cladding changes with each setback or overhang (shift in volume). They're trying to make each shift stand out visually.

That said, let me express that..

a) This is not necessary. It can be justified at times, but its certainly not a given that it should occur.

b) There are too many shifts in volume here. One setback is entirely understandable. In some circumstances more might be too. But here, this sets back after the 4th, the 6th, only to come forward again. Other than the provision of more terrace/amenity space, I see no logic to that; and I don't find that a compelling reason either. Rationalize this to a single setback after the 4th floor, and presumably, you would remove two of he cladding types/expressions as well.
 

Back
Top