afransen
Senior Member
"Many"? The most common one, the Model Y, is 1847kg/4070lbs. Model X is not very common comparatively, and it is 5648lb. I think you have to be in a pickup size before weight exceeds 6000 lb
|
|
|
- Thread starter jozl
- Start date
zang
Senior Member
The Mercedes-Benz EQS 580, the Rivian R1S, BMW i7, Cadillac Lyriq are all over 6000lbs, and others push really close like the Kia EV9 (5839lbs).
And yes, the pickups are generally heavier. The *lightest* model of the F-150 Lightning is over 6000lbs, and the heaviest just under 7000. The upcoming Dodge RAM 1500 REV is estimated to be 7500lbs.
Unless the trends really start changing (and car companies decide to stop selling high-margin "light truck" class vehicles), we're aiming to have a heavier weight burden on all infrastructure. In case anyone's missed it, light trucks (including SUVs) now account for more than 80% of new car sales in Canada.
PL1
Senior Member
This could be fixed with legislation. I rather doubt that will happen, but it could. Higher weight vehicles also cause more damage in the inevitable accidents they are involved in.The Mercedes-Benz EQS 580, the Rivian R1S, BMW i7, Cadillac Lyriq are all over 6000lbs, and others push really close like the Kia EV9 (5839lbs).
And yes, the pickups are generally heavier. The *lightest* model of the F-150 Lightning is over 6000lbs, and the heaviest just under 7000. The upcoming Dodge RAM 1500 REV is estimated to be 7500lbs.
Unless the trends really start changing (and car companies decide to stop selling high-margin "light truck" class vehicles), we're aiming to have a heavier weight burden on all infrastructure. In case anyone's missed it, light trucks (including SUVs) now account for more than 80% of new car sales in Canada.
innsertnamehere
Superstar
in terms of road wear, 95% of wear will still come from large work vehicles as damage works on a exponential, not linear scale from weight.
EVs are heavier, but will still cause very little road damage. It's the 15-20,000lb dump trucks which are really causing damage.
Also - as others have pointed out, most EVs are much lighter. As others have said, the Model Y is 4,000lbs. Others are even lighter.
EVs are heavier, but will still cause very little road damage. It's the 15-20,000lb dump trucks which are really causing damage.
Also - as others have pointed out, most EVs are much lighter. As others have said, the Model Y is 4,000lbs. Others are even lighter.
zang
Senior Member
Of course, but those vehicles will also likely be heading the electric route over the next decade or two as well, and will require absolutely massive batteries to pull cargo.
I’ll point out, I’m not anti-electric car. But I’m certainly of the belief that they should be smaller overall. Larger vehicles mean much larger batteries—and that too is a threat.
Frankly, the Gardiner should’ve been torn down decades ago. I can only imagine what’s going to happen to the structure when the inevitable multi-car crash happens, several batteries explode and a massive super-hot fire erupts that’s nearly impossible to extinguish.
Last edited:
afransen
Senior Member
None of those vehicles are selling all that well. R1S is the SUV version of a pickup truck. Rivian is making a smaller SUV which will sell much better. I guess Escalades also weigh about 6k lbs. EVs are generally perhaps 10-15% heavier currently. Batteries are getting lighter so that gap should close.The Mercedes-Benz EQS 580, the Rivian R1S, BMW i7, Cadillac Lyriq are all over 6000lbs, and others push really close like the Kia EV9 (5839lbs).
And yes, the pickups are generally heavier. The *lightest* model of the F-150 Lightning is over 6000lbs, and the heaviest just under 7000. The upcoming Dodge RAM 1500 REV is estimated to be 7500lbs.
Unless the trends really start changing (and car companies decide to stop selling high-margin "light truck" class vehicles), we're aiming to have a heavier weight burden on all infrastructure. In case anyone's missed it, light trucks (including SUVs) now account for more than 80% of new car sales in Canada.
evandyk
Senior Member
The heavier ones are also outside the effective limits for all the guardrails lining highways. They're designed for 5,000 lbs.
And god knows what they'll come up with to protect pedestrians from EVs in front of Union Station
And god knows what they'll come up with to protect pedestrians from EVs in front of Union Station
zang
Senior Member
Yeah, pedestrian deaths have gone up quite a bit with the SUV trend started.The heavier ones are also outside the effective limits for all the guardrails lining highways. They're designed for 5,000 lbs.
And god knows what they'll come up with to protect pedestrians from EVs in front of Union Station
And that’s not to mention newer high-hood pickups that shield the driver from seeing a 5-year old 10 feet away.
America's cars and trucks are getting bigger, and so are their blind zones. Kids are paying the price.
Every year, many kids get hit and die when their parents can’t see them in their front blind zones. A senator wants to pass a law requiring safety features to prevent these accidents.
www.nbcnews.com
Why we haven’t bothered to put more regulation on the “light truck” class is beyond me. Even standardized bumper height, visibility requirements or weight limits for non-commercial vehicles seem completely reasonable, but yeah… Drivers will always get priority.
zang
Senior Member
The SUV trend itself, whether electric or ICE, is a problem. It means an overall heavier average vehicle weight of all vehicles on the road.
I think that people tend to underestimate the weight difference between EVs and their ICE counterparts.
‘To further complicate matters, weight gain is even more of an issue for EVs. The Detroit News recently noted that “the starting weight of an electric Hyundai Kona is 28% heavier than the gas-powered model, and the Nissan Leaf is 35% heavier than the starting weight of its gas-powered equivalent.”
Why more people are getting interested in vehicle weight
With so much cutting-edge tech discussion concerning zero emissions and self-driving, a new motoring acronym, LACES, highlights a fundamental element of vehicle design that seems to have gone missing recently: weight. LACES stands for “lightweight, automated, connected, electric and shared”...
tide.theimi.org.uk
“[Jennifer] Homendy [chair of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board] said electric models from Ford, Volvo and Toyota were all roughly 33 per cent heavier than the gas-powered versions of the same vehicles.”
Why the ‘significant’ weight of electric vehicles is sparking new safety fears - National | Globalnews.ca
"The occupants in the lighter vehicle are always going to come out worse," one expert says about growing electric vehicle safety fears.
globalnews.ca
But unlikely to stop the weight creep that’s been happening for decades. In general, we’ve been making cars heavier and heavier, regardless of whether they’re ICE or EV.
Lighter batteries are likely to spur a demand for longer ranges on EVs (regardless of what actual usage patterns require). Which means even bigger batteries.
In addition, lighter batteries will increase costs and prices in a market that’s seen a 10-20% price increase every year since 2019.
The average price of a new car sold in 2024: ~$67k.
The average price of a new car sold in 2019: ~$40
Despite this new car sales right now are still far behind pre-pandemic numbers and are trending downward. The reason why the SUV and truck markets have increased as a share and been marketed like crazy; they have bigger profit margins that help offset the drop in sales. Some manufacturers have dropped previously-successful low-margin subcompacts entirely in favour of higher margin SUVS.
innsertnamehere
Superstar
studies have shown that while SUVs are worse for pedestrian safety, it's only a marginal contributing factor.Yeah, pedestrian deaths have gone up quite a bit with the SUV trend started.
And that’s not to mention newer high-hood pickups that shield the driver from seeing a 5-year old 10 feet away.
America's cars and trucks are getting bigger, and so are their blind zones. Kids are paying the price.
Every year, many kids get hit and die when their parents can’t see them in their front blind zones. A senator wants to pass a law requiring safety features to prevent these accidents.
Why we haven’t bothered to put more regulation on the “light truck” class is beyond me. Even standardized bumper height, visibility requirements or weight limits for non-commercial vehicles seem completely reasonable, but yeah… Drivers will always get priority.
IIRC the shift to SUVs in the US market has resulted in something like "only" 20-50 additional pedestrian deaths a year. The theory is that there are other contributing factors to skyrocketing pedestrian deaths - honestly I think more of it has to do where Americans are living (southern, extremely pedestrian hostile environments), distracted driving, much higher vehicle speeds (ESPECIALLY in urban areas), and lower levels of enforcement of both driver behavior and vehicle maintenance.
Also - Pedestrian deaths in Canada have been largely falling - going from 304 in 2017 to 280 in 2021:
Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics: 2021
Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics: 2021
The difference between Canadian and US traffic fatality rates couldn't be more stark - they are a world apart. Canadian traffic fatalities continue to trend substantially downward, even for pedestrians, while US numbers are increasing.
Last edited:
turbanplanner
Senior Member
Obviously just my opinion but people being more "squeezed" in day to day life, in addition to worsening traffic means people are making more high risk low reward moves. I see so many people not even slowing down at a red light when making a turn, etc.studies have shown that while SUVs are worse for pedestrian safety, it's only a marginal contributing factor.
IIRC the shift to SUVs in the US market has resulted in something like "only" 20-50 additional pedestrian deaths a year. The theory is that there are other contributing factors to skyrocketing pedestrian deaths - honestly I think more of it has to do where Americans are living (southern, extremely pedestrian hostile environments) and distracted driving.
Also - Pedestrian deaths in Canada have been largely falling - going from 304 in 2017 to 280 in 2021:
Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics: 2021
Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics: 2021tc.canada.ca
The difference between Canadian and US traffic fatality rates couldn't be more stark - they are a world apart. Canadian traffic fatalities continue to trend substantially downward, even for pedestrians, while US numbers continue to increase.
innsertnamehere
Superstar
perhaps, but ancedotes are not evidence. Canada's road fatality rate in absolute numbers continues to drop quite substantially. Fatalities have dropped 38% and injuries have dropped a whopping 51% since 2002 in gross numbers, and per capita by even larger amounts. And this trend is continuing.
turbanplanner
Senior Member
I wonder how much this has to do with lowering the speed limits? 50 vs 40 can be the difference between death or a few weeks in the hospital.
innsertnamehere
Superstar
Whole bunch of factors. Road safety improvements definitely help and probably the biggest contributor to the pedestrian death rates. Most of the improvements are more likely from improved vehicle safety standards.
The problem south of the border is that the US has been counteracting safety improvements in vehicle design with much more unsafe driving environments and poor regulation of new driving behaviors. Things like distracted driving, extreme speeding, and drunk driving are far more prevalent.
Certian laws in Ontario like it's strict DUI standards (0.05 v.s 0.08 in most jurisdictions), stunt driving laws, and harsh penalties for distracted driving keep those dangerous activities to a minimum. The penalties are some of the strictest on the continent.
The biggest factor between the two countries IMO is the design of suburban arterial roads. Canada's are generally still relatively low speed. It's very common to see very high-conflict suburban arterials in the US with 45mph speed limits which is basically insane from a Canadian perspective. Once you couple that with poorer enforcement.. you get bad results. Anecdotally very few Canadians speed any significant amount in urban areas either, limiting that to rural and freeway driving.. which is not the case in the US.
The problem south of the border is that the US has been counteracting safety improvements in vehicle design with much more unsafe driving environments and poor regulation of new driving behaviors. Things like distracted driving, extreme speeding, and drunk driving are far more prevalent.
Certian laws in Ontario like it's strict DUI standards (0.05 v.s 0.08 in most jurisdictions), stunt driving laws, and harsh penalties for distracted driving keep those dangerous activities to a minimum. The penalties are some of the strictest on the continent.
The biggest factor between the two countries IMO is the design of suburban arterial roads. Canada's are generally still relatively low speed. It's very common to see very high-conflict suburban arterials in the US with 45mph speed limits which is basically insane from a Canadian perspective. Once you couple that with poorer enforcement.. you get bad results. Anecdotally very few Canadians speed any significant amount in urban areas either, limiting that to rural and freeway driving.. which is not the case in the US.
Jonny5
Senior Member
Definitely the rise of daily aggravations are a significant factor, and while you say it's "low reward", sometimes beating the system one time, no matter how small the ultimate benefit becomes, is really a huge relative reward.
King Street violations are an example of this.