Personally, I think the National Portrait Gallery is better resolved architecturally. Unfortunately both are likely beyond the abilities of our little provincial backwater though.
![]()
Ooof, way over the top. Those are practically this!

Source
42
Personally, I think the National Portrait Gallery is better resolved architecturally. Unfortunately both are likely beyond the abilities of our little provincial backwater though.
![]()
Ooof, way over the top. Those are practically this!
Personally, I think the National Portrait Gallery is better resolved architecturally. Unfortunately both are likely beyond the abilities of our little provincial backwater though.
![]()
A stylish quality court yard atrium...not a full blown acid trip. Not that the latter is entirely a bad thing...Ooof, way over the top. Those are practically this!
![]()
42
A stylish quality court yard atrium...not a full blown acid trip. Not that the latter is entirely a bad thing...![]()
I wonder if something more appropriate for our context might be a multi-ridged glass roof supported on four mass timber posts, one at each corner, and only laying gently on the existing roof, without putting any structural stress on it that would require rebuilding within the attics. Mass timber would match with our times, complement the brick, and be more of a nod to our vast forests than to Fosterized atria.Inappropriate for this context though.
AoD
Fair point!Inappropriate for this context though.
AoD
Expect to see former city hall bureaucrats to create private sector consulting companies to do the needed work. And pay them the big bucks for the extra time needed to come up with the same ideas they already have.From the Globe by @AlexBozikovic:
![]()
Toronto’s Old City Hall is a chance to think big, but timid bureaucracy is stifling its potential
Two city departments and a platoon of consultants are ‘reimagining’ Old City Hall, smothering it in bureaucratic fogwww.theglobeandmail.com
AoD