lenaitch
Senior Member
The way I read the Emergency Order, it proposes to compel "persons to render essential service". Nothing about commandeering their property should they refuse, although some argue a section of the Criminal Code authorizes it but I'm not convinced it does.I think the government has the ability to commandeer their resources under the Act. Their refusal is irrevelant.
In other news - a totally predictable move:
AoD
"Safely" may be one thing, knowing how to do it at all would be another. There is probably a cadre of police officers that would have this skill, however rusty, from a previous life, and there is a chance a canvass has already been done. The liabilities are not insignificant unless the area is completely evacuated first. I heard one media outlet mention that in Windsor they had secured some operators from Michigan.Equipment sure, but who knows how to safely operate heavy tow equipment other than those owner/operators who'll likely refuse to take part?
*****
Regarding the handing out of pamphlets, given that any enforcement will likely be under the Emergency Order, and those offences themselves didn't exist a couple of days ago, I don't see it as a bad idea, and may have been recommended by Crown lawyers.
Although the Act says a declaration of a Public Order Emergency is effective the day it is made, the police may be waiting until it is confirmed by Parliament.