News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

Looks like the release valve has been opened to Gazan resettlement in France:


.
You mean facilitating ethnic cleansing instead of coercing Israel to stop its war crime...No wonder Europe has became a joke in the eyes of the Global South. Even BRICS rejected France
 
Looks like the release valve has been opened to Gazan resettlement in France:


.

That's one way to get Le Pen elected.....
 
Le Pen will get elected as Macron is a sitting duck President. France and most of Europe has become a refugee dump and in smaller countries like Belgium the refugees and immigrants are becoming the majority and that’s essentially cultural and eventually population extinction of a native population. European far right will only grow in popularity because Europe is not like North America and they should stop importing so many migrants and cut the benefits to them because it allows them to live without contributing to the country, meaning they don’t integrate and cause crime and chaos.
 
Le Pen will get elected as Macron is a sitting duck President

The term you were looking for was 'lame duck'.

. France and most of Europe has become a refugee dump

Please submit a citation in support of this.

While certainly there are more assylum seekers than in cerement memory and there is certainly friction/discontent over this in places.....

I can't find any source placing the numbers of above 20,000,000 (20 million) out of a population of 744 million for Europe as a whole, and more practically 450 million for the European Union.

So, at most, we're talking ~4%, pending evidence to the contrary.

***

More broadly, 14% of the European Union population is foreign born. (inclusive of legal immigrants)

This compares to 23% of the Canadian population and 31% of the Australian population and is almost identical o the number of 14% in the U.S.



and in smaller countries like Belgium the refugees and immigrants are becoming the majority

Belgium is an interesting case, though, its important to note that Brussels is the capital of the E-U.

This is not all population from outside Europe, it includes politicians/staff from throughout the E-U. as you might expect.

But yes, the rate of foreign-born is extremely high in Belgium.

and that’s essentially cultural and eventually population extinction of a native population. European far right will only grow in popularity because Europe is not like North America and they should stop importing so many migrants and cut the benefits to them because it allows them to live without contributing to the country, meaning they don’t integrate and cause crime and chaos.

Citation needed.

Undoubtedly some immigrants/refugees are a problem in some nations, but your broad-based swipe does not read well at all, absent evidence in support of that claim it reads worse still.

A brief survey of the literature suggests that when adjusted for economic circumstance, immigrants in France are no more likely to engage in crime than the general population.

Here's the homicide rate with a 15-year trendline for the E-U:

1752998814170.png



Hmmm, looks to be trending down to me.

Ah, but its property crime you say:

1752998882639.png



Hmm, I don't see the evidence there either.

Now, important to concede, there is an uptick in sexual violence/rape:

1752998965361.png


That requires further follow up though to establish the link to reporting rate, changes in laws, (consent/age of consent etc.). I don't have time for a deep dive there at the moment.

But on cursory observation, your suggestion does not seem to be born out the by the evidence.

That's not to suggest there is no linkage at all, for a variety of reasons, but its incumbent on you to provide evidence in support of such a controversial position.
 
^ Things like the Grooming Scandal in the UK aren't helping the reputation of immigrants and refugees. There were also stories like this:



Which follows after this:


Looks like attacking Christmas Markets is starting to become a tradition for terrorists.

I don't think it helps that authorities routinely try to downplay the involvement of refugees or immigrants in these incidents, which then breeds accusations of official complicity, undermining trust in government.

I just hope we aren't setting up for a similar backlash in Canada. That's what was bad about the strip mall college student surge. But we also have problems like this:


I am not a fan of telling people they shouldn't be worried at all about any of this. Or that their concerns aren't legitimate. That's how you get the the far right into power.
 
Last edited:
Here is an example and citation from Sweden:

Src:

The core issue is lack of integration of a large number of immigrant groups, which is creating a large spike in crime - “Sweden has one of the highest gun death rates per capita of any European country for which there are figures.”

The key issue is really that Europe needs to figure out how much migrants it can absorb that is manageable. It also needs to keep the native population from becoming a minority on its own lands. In a country like Sweden, having a large immigrant population that becomes the majority who can then demand a parallel society with parallel laws (e.g. Sharia law) is a path to ruin for a society with very levels of trust and peaceful existence. Already Sweden is unable to manage crime in certain areas which are no go zones (e.g. certain Stockholm and Malmö suburbs). Similar issues are happening in other smaller countries.

This is a problem really for all Western countries to some degree as we all have to figure out what is a manageable level and how to build a pluralistic society. It’s a bit easier in US/Canada as we are a population of mostly immigrants and we have opportunities for immigrants to integrate. We aren’t immune here in Canada and we are seeing the beginning of the end of mass approvals of high number of immigrants due to our inability to absorb such high numbers without the infrastructure (physical and social) and economic opportunity to support such large population increases.

In Europe that is much harder, especially for visible minorities because many small countries don’t really want immigration but it’s hoisted upon them by the EU or certain politicians.

However the issue in Europe is one of survival. The demographics are awful, much like in Japan where the native population is dying off and the younger population is majority immigrants and in many cases visible majorities. What happens when demographics become destiny especially for smaller European countries- many cultures may simply disappear by the end of the century or become minorities in their own lands. It doesn’t bode well for social stability and cohesion.

This isn’t a unique thing in Europe. We are seeing the symptoms of this everywhere why we see the rise of nationalism or nationalistic type of politics - as it is there to address an element of fear in the population. It’s also one reason why Trump won in the U.S. last year. The U.S. is going to become a country where the majority white population will become a minority and that change of demographics will not be simple to address politically.
 
Last edited:
Here is an example and citation from Sweden:

Src:

The core issue is lack of integration of a large number of immigrant groups, which is creating a large spike in crime - “Sweden has one of the highest gun death rates per capita of any European country for which there are figures.”

The key issue is really that Europe needs to figure out how much migrants it can absorb that is manageable. It also needs to keep the native population from becoming a minority on its own lands. In a country like Sweden, having a large immigrant population that becomes the majority who can then demand a parallel society with parallel laws (e.g. Sharia law) is a path to ruin for a society with very levels of trust and peaceful existence. Already Sweden is unable to manage crime in certain areas which are no go zones (e.g. certain Stockholm and Malmö suburbs). Similar issues are happening in other smaller countries.

This is a problem really for all Western countries to some degree as we all have to figure out what is a manageable level and how to build a pluralistic society. It’s a bit easier in US/Canada as we are a population of mostly immigrants and we have opportunities for immigrants to integrate. We aren’t immune here in Canada and we are seeing the beginning of the end of mass approvals of high number of immigrants due to our inability to absorb such high numbers without the infrastructure (physical and social) and economic opportunity to support such large population increases.

In Europe that is much harder, especially for visible minorities because many small countries don’t really want immigration but it’s hoisted upon them by the EU or certain politicians.

However the issue in Europe is one of survival. The demographics are awful, much like in Japan where the native population is dying off and the younger population is majority immigrants and in many cases visible majorities. What happens when demographics become destiny especially for smaller European countries- many cultures may simply disappear by the end of the century or become minorities in their own lands. It doesn’t bode well for social stability and cohesion.

This isn’t a unique thing in Europe. We are seeing the symptoms of this everywhere why we see the rise of nationalism or nationalistic type of politics - as it is there to address an element of fear in the population. It’s also one reason why Trump won in the U.S. last year. The U.S. is going to become a country where the majority white population will become a minority and that change of demographics will not be simple to address politically.

Sweden's homicide rate declined last year, to its lowest in a decade:


Yes, they have had integration problems with some immigrants, and yes, some of it ties into gang violence, but its also too simplistic to suggest that is the principle cause.


There is clearly a link to the long term economic success (or not) of a given area, irrespective of its ethnic composition. There is a suggested link in the above story to social media's role.

I am not a fan of telling people they shouldn't be worried at all about any of this. Or that their concerns aren't legitimate. That's how you get the the far right into power.

I was among the first to highlight the role of inordinate, foreign students and TFWs in our housing crisis, and stagnant wages.

So I'm all for honesty and transparency even when the subject is touchy and the opinion may not be popular.

However, I think that needs to be balanced; not only by properly delineating correlation and causation, but also by understanding why a particular group segment may be an issue; and why.

One can absolutely critique that some individuals or groups should have been admitted to a given country, or that the overall volume posed challenges for services or integration, but letting that stretch into fear mongering and hyperbole is not wise either.
 
Since some nonsense about Belgium and how refugees are the majority now was posted above, here you go https://statbel.fgov.be/en/themes/population/structure-population/origin
In absolute figures, the Belgian population on 01/01/2025 was composed of 7,571,338 Belgians with a Belgian background, 2,619,289 Belgians with a foreign background and 1,634,924 non-Belgians.

The share of Belgians with a Belgian background has decreased from 79.3% in 2005 to 71.4% in 2015 and 64.0% in 2025.

In the tables down the to municipal level, we distinguish three nationality groups of origin: neighbouring country (France, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Germany, the United Kingdom), another country of the European Union and a country outside the European Union. More than half (54.3%) of Belgians with a foreign background and non-Belgians have a nationality from outside the European Union. Then comes the nationality group European Union excluding neighbouring countries (27.0%). The smallest nationality group is that of neighbouring countries (18.7%).

Just under half of Belgians with a foreign background and non-Belgians (45.7%) come from a member state of the European Union: 18.7% from a neighbouring country, 17.6% from the EU14 and 9.4% from the EU13. The other half (54.3%) comes from a country outside the EU zone: 17.1% from North Africa, 9.2% from Sub-Saharan Africa, 8.2% from an EU candidate country, 6.7% from West Asia. The other nationality groups each account for less than 5%.
So basically, about 35% of the population of Belgium is non-Belgian, but of that 25%, approx 45% of those non-Belgians are from the Europe.
 

Back
Top