News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

So, according to one of the hopefuls on the Better Edmonton Slate, he was in support of allowing the market to control infill, rather than council. Still, he said the party wasn’t meant to all share the same perspective on issues.

“The formation of the party was always on the basis of allowing for disagreement, allowing for a variety of opinions when it comes to different issues. There’s no whipping the vote,” said Kandola.

Which begs the question - if all thirteen of the candidates forming the slate don’t share the same perspective and disagree on different issues, WTF is the point of forming a party and running a slate or asking voters to support a slate in the first place?
 
Apparently, changing from at-large to ward-based systems is associated with a 20% drop in housing permits because municipal politicians are compelled to switch from advocating what's best for the city as a whole to addressing the demands of their local constituents. It's remarkable that Edmonton is so pro-housing despite having a ward-based system.
 
Apparently, changing from at-large to ward-based systems is associated with a 20% drop in housing permits because municipal politicians are compelled to switch from advocating what's best for the city as a whole to addressing the demands of their local constituents. It's remarkable that Edmonton is so pro-housing despite having a ward-based system.
There is a gravity towards what you worry about. Ward residents complain that councillors are not acting in the exclusive interest of their ward. It remains to be seen if the new Council will bash each other because of this pressure, particularly given the division of the Better Edmonton party courtesy of the provincial government.
 
Last edited:
Walters puts his hat in the ring.

Screenshot 2025-07-21 at 8.50.40 AM.png
 
Reported earlier, but Michael Walters is running:

"On zoning, he supports a reduction of mid-block density from eight units to six, but also thinks the city needs to take a broader approach to housing that isn’t so focused on mature neighbourhood infill."

I Wonder what he is proposing ?
 
Reported earlier, but Michael Walters is running:
I am not sure who I will support yet, but we really need practical and collaborative now. .

Gerein is correct, voters are not really that enthusiastic about the other candidates so far, which is probably why Walters is jumping in at this point.
 
I like Walters but I feel like he's the Kim Krushell of this election. There's a window of time when voters remember you and have positive feelings for you. I think that window has closed for him (let alone Jaffer). Campaigns do matter though, but he's already late to the game.

This election is between Knack and Cartmell. The voting bloc that has supported Sohi and Iveson will largely vote for Knack. The Nickel voters and centre-rights will gravitate to Cartmell.

My prediction: Knack wins with 38%, Cartmell at 32% with the others in the teens to single digits.
 
I like Walters but I feel like he's the Kim Krushell of this election. There's a window of time when voters remember you and have positive feelings for you. I think that window has closed for him (let alone Jaffer). Campaigns do matter though, but he's already late to the game.

This election is between Knack and Cartmell. The voting bloc that has supported Sohi and Iveson will largely vote for Knack. The Nickel voters and centre-rights will gravitate to Cartmell.

My prediction: Knack wins with 38%, Cartmell at 32% with the others in the teens to single digits.

A lot can still happen I feel once the candidates start getting into it. Is the dt business crowd like downtown business coalition and the Chamber's support for Cartmell solid and locked in, or could they switch to Walters with his pro Rossdale development pitch for example.

Listened to Walters this morning and he mentioned basics like the buses running on time - he mentioned it twice actually. From what I understand on buses, especially our busiest routes that can struggle to run on time, it's because buses are getting caught in traffic within the same lanes single occupancy vehicles travel. Is he prepared to designate more of our existing road space to buses only and thereby cutting car lanes? I'm curious on his approach with this.
 
I like Walters but I feel like he's the Kim Krushell of this election. There's a window of time when voters remember you and have positive feelings for you. I think that window has closed for him (let alone Jaffer). Campaigns do matter though, but he's already late to the game.

This election is between Knack and Cartmell. The voting bloc that has supported Sohi and Iveson will largely vote for Knack. The Nickel voters and centre-rights will gravitate to Cartmell.

My prediction: Knack wins with 38%, Cartmell at 32% with the others in the teens to single digits.
Normally, being an incumbent is a great advantage but while not everyone remembers much about past councilors, a lot of people currently do have a lot of unpleasant feelings about the current bunch.

There is almost a desperation for a better alternative now and being associated too closely with Sohi now may be the kiss of death. Someone like Walters could take away support from both of the incumbent councilors running for mayor, bringing their already kind of lackluster numbers down even more.
 

Back
Top