News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

Committee members are Hamilton, Salvador, Stevenson, Rutherford, Sohi.

"Item 7.1 0

Rowing Shell Exemption
Moved by: S. Hamilton
Carried: 5 - 0 - 0
Moved by: Councillor Hamilton

That section 61(3) of Bylaw 20700 be deleted and replaced with: 61(3) This section does not apply to persons: on the Edmonton Riverboat; or operating racing canoes, racing kayaks, or rowing shells when exempted by and in compliance with the Small Vessel Regulations (Canada).

Close Public Spaces
Moved by: E. Rutherford
Carried 5 - 0 - 0

That section 6(g) of Bylaw 20700 be amended by deleting “or permanent”.

Special Events - Charter Protection
Moved by: A. Sohi
Carried: 5 - 0 - 0

That Bylaw 20700 be amended by adding section 40(5): 40(5) Nothing in this section will be applied or interpreted to prevent the exercise of fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Allow Skateboards, etc on Sidewalks
Moved by: A. Salvador
Carried: 5 - 0 - 0

That section 78(1) of Bylaw 20700 be deleted and replaced with: 78(1) A person must not ride a bicycle, e-bicycle, or e-scooter on a sidewalk. |

Increase Exemption Age to 16
Moved by: E. Rutherford
Carried: 5 - 0 - 0

That section 78(2) of Bylaw 20700 be amended by deleting and replacing “14” with “16”.

Exempt Feeding of Feral Cats
Moved by: A. Sohi
Carried: 5 - 0 - 0

That Bylaw 20700 be amended as follows: renumbering section 16 as section 16(1); adding section 16(2): Subsection (1) does not apply to feral cats."

 
Last edited:
When certain Mayoral candidates are criticizing the plan for the upcoming bridgework, bear in mind whether they had opportunities to address this before it benefited their political careers. It helps indicate how effective they actually are. The timeline is from this article.

Bridge.PNG
 
If Karen Principe's federal run (as a Conservative, natch) for Edmonton-Griesbach is unsuccessful, do you think she'll seek re-election to city council?

 
When certain Mayoral candidates are criticizing the plan for the upcoming bridgework, bear in mind whether they had opportunities to address this before it benefited their political careers. It helps indicate how effective they actually are. The timeline is from this article.

View attachment 632156
Absolutely. Council had the opportunity to make the repairs gradually over their term, but instead shoveled it down the line. Now we're looking at the near-complete closure of Downtown access.
 
Absolutely. Council had the opportunity to make the repairs gradually over their term, but instead shoveled it down the line. Now we're looking at the near-complete closure of Downtown access.
While I don't catastrophize about this as much of others, I do agree Council had the opportunity to plan this better. And I really don't want to pussyfoot around here about that, lets name names.

Cartmell is on council and is just as much a part of that as the others. He can not just try pretend he was off working somewhere else over the last several years, that would be dishonest and insults everyone's intelligence.
 
While I don't catastrophize about this as much of others, I do agree Council had the opportunity to plan this better. And I really don't want to pussyfoot around here about that, lets name names.

Cartmell is on council and is just as much a part of that as the others. He can not just try pretend he was off working somewhere else over the last several years, that would be dishonest and insults everyone's intelligence.
He's also holding up the grail of "build it better", and every time he puts out collateral for it you half-expect it to come with a plan of some sort.

It's always nothing. Just him saying construction is a problem as if he hasn't had any say in it since 2021.
 

Back
Top