News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.8K     0 

barrytron3030

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Messages
901
Reaction score
3
Toronto’s development industry has tanked, councillor laments
Posted: January 21, 2009, 11:55 PM by Rob Roberts
Kuitenbrouwer


What a difference a couple of years makes.

Adam Vaughan ran for city council in 2006 on a pledge to curb “unbridled†condominium development, which he called a threat to stable neighbourhoods in west downtown Toronto. Today, Councillor Vaughan (Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina) has the opposite concern: the condominium market, he says, is imploding.

“This bubble had to burst to some degree, but it’s bursting now in a catastrophic way,†he said yesterday over a hot chocolate. “A tsunami has rolled through the development industry.â€

“I checked my diary,†he added. “In the first two years since my election, I was getting five new [development] applications a week. It was an extraordinary pace. I haven’t have a single application in the past six months.â€

On the southeast corner of Adelaide and John streets, spitting distance from Metro Hall, two parking lots abut the old brick home of the Fox and Fiddle pub. Mr. Vaughan said developers recently purchased those lots from the Farber family, assuming “huge mortgages.†City Council is studying applications for two towers here, 44 and 42 storeys, but financing troubles mean those towers now are delayed, he said.

“For whatever reason, the real estate bubble in my ward was bigger than Kyle’s or Pam’s,†he added, refering to Pam McConnell (Ward 28, Toronto Centre-Rosedale) and Kyle Rae (Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale).

Looking around, it’s hard to believe the construction industry is in trouble: a hydraulic excavator was busy yesterday loading shale into dump trucks in a mine-sized hole at Adelaide and University avenues, where the Shangri-La hotel is set to rise. Indeed, Mr. Vaughan says he has 89 projects underway in his ward.

At Simcoe and Nelson streets, workers hammered away on yet another condo project. But a cement truck driver, Rob, said the slowdown is coming — fast.

“We had some jobs that we were supposed to do that got cancelled,†he said. “Really it’s the banks’ fault. The people want to buy, the people want to build, but the banks won’t give the money.â€

Architect Don Schmitt, whose firm is building condos in Regent Park and elsewhere, said the mood is dark. ‘‘There’s definitely huge uncertainty in the market, where people are sitting on their hands, both purchasers and developers,’’ he said.

Mr. Vaughan said he and Mr. Rae recently went to see Mayor David Miller to ask what he can do to prop up the development industry.

Stuart Green, a spokesman for Mr. Miller, says “the mayor is very concerned about a potential slowdown, which is why he announced a development-charge freeze on residential construction.†Developers pay the city $4,500 for each one-bedroom condo they build.

Condo development has been a motor of our economy for a long stretch. West of downtown, on the former Molson Brewery site near the gates of the Canadian National Exhibition, workers have been erecting condos at a breakneck pace for several years. The work is so steady that Bob Pritchard six years ago traded in his lunch truck for a permanent coffee shop catering to construction workers. After I profiled the place in the paper awhile ago, Mr. Pritchard adopted the name I’d tagged on the place: the Hard Hat Café.

But his business may soon slow, he says: “They’ve put a hold on two buildings here until the economy straightens out a little bit.â€
According to Mr. Vaughan’s web site, the two John/Adelaide projects are a Daniels Corp. application for a 44-storey tower, at 21 Windmer St., and an application by Pinnacle International, a Vancouver-based condo builder, for a 42-storey tower at 295 Adelaide Street W. Those companies did not immediately return calls.

Mr. Vaughan is now throwing out ideas to prop up the construction industry, which employs not just hardhat workers but also planners, architects, designers, marketers and engineers, he notes. “Condo development is our General Motors,†he says.
Bailing out companies who boast of their “coveted services†and “privileged memberships†(words I took from one condo hoarding) may be tough for some to stomach.

Among Mr. Vaughan’s ideas: He suggests the province could help the firms in exchange for 10% affordable housing in each tower.

Adam Vaughan stands in a parking lot at the corners of John and Adelaide streets, which was to be the site of a condo tower. Photo by Peter J. Thompson, National Post

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/...t-industry-has-tanked-councillor-laments.aspx
 
i thought this thread was about a disabled development.
 
Paradoxical yes, but being devil's advocate is a healthy approach in politics, I suppose. He's allowed to have his concerns.
 
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. Yeah, it's very clear that our current crisis is cause by over-regulation, over-taxation, and over-subsidization. Nothing to do whatever with greed, incompetence, under-regulation, and a blind, well-nigh religious belief in the "market".
 
Yeah, it's very clear that our current crisis is cause by over-regulation, over-taxation, and over-subsidization. Nothing to do whatever with greed, incompetence, under-regulation, and a blind, well-nigh religious belief in the "market".
The point is Vaughan (and, many more) types expend tons of energy during the good times trying to slow down work, but then the moment that actually happens start figuring out ways to start it back up. I wouldn't care if he was gloating that construction has stopped, at least that would be consistent. But complaining about the slow down in development reads like a spoiled child.
 
Wow, I can't wait till Mr Vaughan tries to have developers completely ignore the official plan, or allow them to submit substandard condo designs, just to encourage development.
 
mr vaughn is a politician, meaning of course that he is a two-faced populist. but hey i love politics, this is the system we have created for ourselves.

anyway, this "crisis" is really not a crisis. these are condos were talking about, not infrastructure, hospitals, community centres or hunger even. development reacts to the market. there is still more development now than there was before the boom.

people need to borrow money to purchase, lease, rent etc... these buildings. once the economy stabilizes, banks will be willing to once again dole out the cash.
 
It's clear that some of you know pretty much nothing about Vaughan's views on development.
 
Just to clear a few things up ... I'm no Vaughn lover by any stretch.

But by no means was he ever against condo developments outright. He was against condo developments that didn't fit the context of his neighborhoods. But, and take this is a good sign, once precedence was set with a few buildings i.e. the Festival tower, he evolved and was even positive about some of the larger proposals.
 
Adam Vaughan is always so pardoxical!

i worked with mr. v. for years in "the media" and can say with some certainty that he is finally growing up.
he's only now entering the "adult phase" of his life.
and beginning to understand the need for development and the delicate balance between ideology and pragmatism.
good for him.
 
you seem to be right. i remember he opposed the entire cityplace development as he believed the neighbourhood would become a second st. jamestown.
 
i remember he opposed the entire cityplace development as he believed the neighbourhood would become a second st. jamestown.

funny you should bring that up. i mentioned to him at the time that i thought it would be exactly the opposite; that eventually, st. jamestown would develop back into a toney, gentrified complex as it was originally designed to be. imagine what 20 years and more pressure for condos could bring - a complete overhaul and restoration of the development sold as jet-set 20th-century-living-for-the-retro-minded.
 
yea but happens to all the poor immigrant families? as far as i'm concerned, toronto is way behind in being to adequately support its lower class. they are getting better though. the TCHC projects on this forum are impressive and empowring, we just need more.
 

Back
Top