News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

Here's an OnXpress post about prefabricating track panels at the newly commissioned Mimico Logistics Hub. This should make On-Corridor construction more efficient.

As noted above, they're also building a logistics hub at the intersection of the KI line and Islington Ave.
seems counter-intuitive that they are using wood for the ties when all of their recent trackwork used concrete ties.
 

Another one.
 
No, in fact just yesterday I received the following response from GO Transit Customer Care to my comment to them asking why there are no express trains given that the third track is still in service between Guildwood and Danforth:
...

Michael Lindsay (about 16 min mark) touched on this briefly as local politicians are (formally) asking questions now - Unfortunately, without any further clarity. He reiterated the 3rd track being out of service (at/near East Harbour) is why express service is still suspended for the entire line - hinted that there really isn't anything that can be done...in his words after speaking of adjusting schedules to meet demands:
...But honestly, forthrightly, these are the types of tradeoffs that are necessary between service and massive capital construction...
There was further mention of service recently added in the AM leaving Whitby (730am?), and in the near future, adding more peak service in Oct/Nov as people return to the office. I wonder if this is why they are not considering - no point in adding express service if you have to remove it again if they need to ramp up local service.
 
Michael Lindsay (about 16 min mark) touched on this briefly as local politicians are (formally) asking questions now - Unfortunately, without any further clarity. He reiterated the 3rd track being out of service (at/near East Harbour) is why express service is still suspended for the entire line - hinted that there really isn't anything that can be done...in his words after speaking of adjusting schedules to meet demands:

There was further mention of service recently added in the AM leaving Whitby (730am?), and in the near future, adding more peak service in Oct/Nov as people return to the office. I wonder if this is why they are not considering - no point in adding express service if you have to remove it again if they need to ramp up local service.
The express service can BE the additional service. Start with 15-minute local service and add express trains as required. They are currently running 5 local trains per hour, which is more than they have ever run before. Pre-pandemic it was 2 local trains per hour (and 4 express), and in 2021 it was 4 local trains per hour (and 2 express). Based on your description it sounds like they may be returning to 6 trains per hour, which would directly contradict their claim that the reduction to 2 tracks prevents them from adding service.

Whether or not a train runs express east of Danforth has no impact on the capacity through the constrained segment west of Danforth, because there are no stops in that segment. When an express train overtakes a local train using the passing track between Guildwood and Danforth, it ends up about 5 minutes ahead of the local at the pinch point, which is pretty much the headway we want anyway to maximize utilization of the line. There is no long gap that could produce inefficient capacity utilization.

Railways around the world manage to schedule overtakes using a few hundred metres of siding at a local station. Meanwhile on Lakeshore East even during OL construction there is a 12-kilometre segment of passing track in service including 4 intermediate stations. The reason they don't want to run express service must be something other than what they're telling us, because if we were to believe that they are incapable of running express service with the currently operating tracks, it would mean that GO Transit Rail Operations are completely incompetent.

Here's the track pattern they can use in the AM Peak. It's almost identical to the one they already use to enable Via Rail express trains to overtake local trains. Stouffville is technically an express train but based on my observations they typically route it on the local track to minimize conflicts.
Capture.PNG

In the PM Peak, the passing track is only 3 stations long because the OL project neglected to install a parallel crossover such as the ones already present at Guildwood and Durham Junctions. But 3 stations is still 2 more stations than other railways need to schedule an overtake. It just means that the local train may need to have a 2 minute extra dwell at Guildwood station to provide more buffer time between the local and express trains to reduce the potential for delays.
Capture2.PNG

Here's how the AM Peak timetable could look with two additional express trips and one existing local trip converted to express:
Screenshot 2025-09-11 at 17.11.40.png


In this timetable it's physically impossible for the 8:48 Via train to be on time due to the conflict with the 8:50 Stouffville train, but that part is just copied from the existing schedule. Nothing to do with the new express trains.
 
Last edited:
The express service CAN BE the additional service. They are currently running 5 local trains per hour, which is more than they have ever run before. Pre-pandemic it was 2 local trains per hour (and 4 express), and in 2021 it was 4 local trains per hour (and 2 express). Based on your description it sounds like they may be returning to 6 trains per hour, which would directly contradict their claim that the reduction to 2 tracks prevents them from adding service.

Whether or not a train runs express east of Danforth has no impact on the capacity through the constrained segment west of Danforth, because there are no stops in that segment. When an express train overtakes a local train using the passing track between Guildwood and Danforth, it ends up about 5 minutes ahead of the local at the pinch point, which is pretty much the headway we want anyway to maximize utilization of the line. There is no long gap that could produce inefficient capacity utilization.

Railways around the world manage to schedule overtakes using a few hundred metres of siding at a local station. Meanwhile on Lakeshore East even during OL construction there is a 12-kilometre segment of passing track in service including 4 intermediate stations. The reason they don't want to run express service must be something other than what they're telling us, because if we were to believe that they are incapable of running express service with the currently operating tracks, it would mean that GO Transit Rail Operations are completely incompetent.
It will be interesting to see their official reply to Rob Cerjanec, the local MPP who asked for written reply. Perhaps some follow up to his office may be warranted if they don't provide detail...
 
The CPG Procurement Opportunities was updated here: https://assets.metrolinx.com/image/...t_Opportunities_Pipeline_-_September_2025.pdf

The prior January 2025 version is still available here for people to compare relevant items for their GO line.

I am hopeful the Mount Joy upgrades (second platform, passing track, signaling etc.) is RFPed before the end of 2025 but not holding my breath. The list combined the Mount Joy upgrades with the Stouffville GO turnback signal into a single contract. The prequalification status for this contract was N/A but was updated to closed as of Dec 2022, which is odd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rbt
seems counter-intuitive that they are using wood for the ties when all of their recent trackwork used concrete ties.

ONxpress maintenance contract was for 25 years. Concrete railway ties have a lifespan of up to 50 years. So value engineering staff for ONxpress [not Metrolinx] may have gotten to them.

Alstom, I believe, now has the maintenance contract so we might see longevity targets shift if advise Metrolinx to top up the capital difference, but it'll take some time to gear up to that.
 
Last edited:
ONxpress maintenance contract was for 25 years. Concrete railway ties have a lifespan of up to 50 years. So value engineering staff for ONxpress [not Metrolinx] may have gotten to them.

Alstom, I believe, now has the maintenance contract so we might see longevity targets shift if advise Metrolinx to top up the capital difference, but it'll take some time to gear up to that.
OnXpress's contract is for the design and work required for all of the track and corridor service enhancements. Not maintenance.

Alstom provides maintenance services for the equipment, not the right-of-way.

The maintenance of the right-of-way has been split into three contracts, with Siemens, A&B and PNR each holding one region.

Dan
 
Oh wow thats probably one of the first major projects in Go Expansion
Note the actual construction is Fall 2026 to 2029.

Does anyone have the original roll plan from like a decade ago? was the station building a part of it?
 
Oh wow thats probably one of the first major projects in Go Expansion
Note the actual construction is Fall 2026 to 2029.

Does anyone have the original roll plan from like a decade ago? was the station building a part of it?
There were many versions of it. The station was originally going to move much further east, because they couldn't build a station on a curve. With an additional station. And each version I saw (none of which I retain) had it getting further and further west. And the new track was always shown on the north, requiring a complete replacement of the existing station. The south plan always made more sense to me. But what happened to the second tunnel?

Good grief - close the south entrance for 2 years? The incompetence here is stunning. Why not do what they did at Exhibition and simply extend the tunnel further south first, and then close it briefly while doing a connection.

And just how isn't that closure listed in the "Expected Impacts section, while they list "temporary road closures and traffic patterns" which are surely very, very, minor.

The public meeting is on September 19th? Any idea where that is? I'm surprised there hasn't been anything in the mailbox yet.
 

Back
Top