[NicolBolas]

I'm curious to see the older design for comparison sake.

New proposal averages 10 stories but it is staggered from 3 at one end to 17 at the other.

I appreciate this comment.
"We have thought, rather than build a 10-storey building that's conventional, we'd like to do something interesting, because it's such a prominent site," said architect Gene Dub.
"We think it's warranted to go through the expense to have an extraordinary design on such a nice site."

It's still a bleh design Gene Dub. Wish we could get some interesting architecture.

 

[IanO]

I kinda love its simplicity and given that its Dub it will be the details.

 

[MacLac]

Simplicity of what? His original proposal? This is not 17 storeys. Have you seen the 17 storey proposal?

View attachment 634611

Picture from this rezoning survey^

 

[IanO]

It is.

Yup. Stand by my original comment.

 

[husky]

Simplicity of what? His original proposal? This is not 17 storeys. Have you seen the 17 storey proposal?

You sure that isn't 17?

 

[MacLac]

It is.

Yup. Stand by my original comment.

Whoops! It is? I didn’t think it was that tall…..my bad. I presumed he submitted a different proposal than this.

 

[MacLac]

What’s the Community League El Presidente referring to as the “other proposal?” That this “new” one doesn’t “look as good.” Maybe that’s why I’m confused

 

[IanO]

There was an original plan for just townhouses and a low-rise.

 

[David A]

Well the process is for feedback, so that's what they get. However, IMO people often seems to get overly preoccupied about height, on all sides.

The 17 storey design I feel actually looks quite good, although I wish it were back from the river a bit more.