What do you think of this project?

  • Total voters
    61
TAS said:
Not my experience and I'm there most everyday. Much busier than a year ago.

I would be more concerned about the Safeway on west Jasper Ave closing before this does.
Click to expand...
That Safeway is deceitfully busy. It's never packed, but it's got very consistent movement, or at least did up until last February, and I can't imagine it got any worse. With the people moving into Mercury and Cobalt, I can't imagine it getting worse at all.
 
TAS said:
Ice District/OEG folks abandoning the third tower didn't help any of the current and future businesses in area thrive.
Click to expand...
What a misinformed comment. OEG didn't 'abandon' anything. As a private sector developer, they obviously ran the numbers and the return on investment wasn't there.

There seems to be a lot of misdirected anger at why developers are not building downtown. The question should be WHY no one is building DT.

Here's a hint: despite all the armchair cheer leading here, the DT generally sucks, is seen as unsafe, not accessible. And the irony, to see the push back on this same forum on the idea of back to work at the office in the DT.

Oy.
 
Last edited:
TAS said:
Not my experience and I'm there most everyday. Much busier than a year ago.

I would be more concerned about the Safeway on west Jasper Ave closing before this does.
Click to expand...
What concerns you about the operation of the 122 st. Safeway store? I live on Jasper, a few blocks east of it and have shopped there 2-3 time a week since I moved back to the city two years ago.

The 122 st store is half the size of the Safeway 'barns' in Capilano and Oliver - and I get in and out in half the time. The store is open every night (except Christmas Day) till 11pm, and (according to the staff) is the only Edmonton Safeway store open on all other statutory holidays - the store is a gem - I've never found it crowed but there is always someone shopping there - last week I was went in at 10:30 and there were a dozen shoppers doing last minute stufff - like me... that's why it feels like a success to me. Plus they have the most convivial and friendly staff members..professionally but most affable.
.
 
OLM said:
What concerns you about the operation of the 122 st. Safeway store? I live on Jasper, a few blocks east of it and have shopped there 2-3 time a week since I moved back to the city two years ago.

The 122 st store is half the size of the Safeway 'barns' in Capilano and Oliver - and I get in and out in half the time. The store is open every night (except Christmas Day) till 11pm, and (according to the staff) is the only Edmonton Safeway store open on all other statutory holidays - the store is a gem - I've never found it crowed but there is always someone shopping there - last week I was went in at 10:30 and there were a dozen shoppers doing last minute stufff - like me... that's why it feels like a success to me. Plus they have the most convivial and friendly staff members..professionally but most affable.
.
Click to expand...

I hope it is a success. I love that it is there. Just never had many people in there when I go, which I made a point of doing when I lived on 113st.
 
whattheheck said:
What a misinformed comment. OEG didn't 'abandon' anything. As a private sector developer, they obviously ran the numbers and the return on investment wasn't there.

There seems to be a lot of misdirected anger at why developers are not building downtown. The question should be WHY no one is building DT.

Here's a hint: despite all the armchair cheer leading here, the DT generally sucks, is seen as unsafe, not accessible. And the irony, to see the push back on this same forum on the idea of back to work at the office in the DT.

Oy.
Click to expand...

Well I choose to live, shop, entertain and work downtown and so I don't think it sucks or that it's unsafe or I wouldn't be doing it but I get many don't feel that way. Lots of work needed to improve, however.

I go by the fact OEG applied for city tax benefit by submitting a residential tower proposal and they were one of about 10 developers that were selected in the program - only two didnt go forward - the OEG one and Open Sky at 121st/102Ave, although I guess they did their excavation.

Shortly after OEG's residential tower development was approved for city incentive (tax break), a perhaps more lucrative opportunity presented itself when CWB was looking for new office space - which OEG pursued and were successful. But that need changed when National Bank bought CWB and so that plan ended and OEG's tax benefit for building a residential tower missed the deadline of construction starting.

Meanwhile, OEG obviously sees potential in DT as they are promising Ice District II residential - if they can secure some more public money, which they now have.

Builders are building downtown - the Switch, the Falcon, the Parks and the city just received about 12 or more proposals for its student incentive grant.
 
Last edited:
Yes, lets try to avoid the negative hyperbole here. Several bigger buildings have been recently completed, some smaller projects and conversions are ongoing, various other projects are proposed that may happen soon.
 
Keep on cheer leading without acknowledging the actual problems that exist lol. Considering the city's population growth, the fact the DT has not captured a decent percentage of that is appalling. Keep on saying DT is great. The growth in the suburbs for both residential and office are proof you're all wrong,

Has there been any actual new private sector development above 10 floors that's started construction in the last four years? Any private sector large scale development that's NOT dependent on public dollars to build?!

Give your collective heads a shake. At least acknowledge there's a problem.
 
whattheheck said:
Keep on cheer leading without acknowledging the actual problems that exist lol. Considering the city's population growth, the fact the DT has not captured a decent percentage of that is appalling. Keep on saying DT is great. The growth in the suburbs for both residential and office are proof you're all wrong,

Has there been any actual new private sector development above 10 floors that's started construction in the last four years? Any private sector large scale development that's NOT dependent on public dollars to build?!

Give your collective heads a shake. At least acknowledge there's a problem.
Click to expand...
Parks started Feb 2022. Falcon was probably close to that too.

Planning is in the works for Parks Tower 2.

You can acknowledge downtown is up shit's creek from a crime perspective while still acknowledging there is development happening. Zymo just opened on Rice Howard, Le Petit in the past year. There are still good things happening DT despite the issues that plague CCM. There have also been residential conversions that are less flashy.

If you want to stay in the burbs and be a cheerleader there, no one is forcing you to go DT. You're being willfully ignorant and gas lighting everyone here to say nothing is happening downtown. The drug and crime problem isn't unique to Edmonton - it is widespread in North America. We're going to have to look to federal agencies to do more about controlling narcotics at the border and looking at legal changes. Until access to drugs is more difficult, the problem isn't likely going to get better. I'm not sure what you want anyone here to say.
 
Well I live in Millwoods but I work in either the downtown area or in the U of A area. The city market in ice District is very handy when I need to pick up lunch when I work at Rogers Place. I think it's just going to take a bit more time as more residential buildings get built in the core. Hopefully more will get built close to or in the ice District sooner than later.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top