IanO
Superstar
Amazing shot. Forward thinking/planing is one thing, especially in certain cities, but with scarcity of resources, you need the best bang for your buck today.
Was gonna let the “only city building stations in fields” thing go but now I have to step in because I’d like to talk about St Louis. Their *busiest* station got 4,800 riders per day in 2018, and their entire system’s daily ridership is less than University Station. All that to say that I would argue there are some systems with far more likely contenders for lowest usage stations. Not to mention “College Station” which is very much in a field, and featured 500 riders per day in 2018, with that number likely now being lower.^i'd bet that that station has the lowest usage of any station in the modern world and while it's infra-ahead-of-people and somewhat was required, it goes against everything foundational about mass transit.
walk
bus
rapid bus
LRT
Heavy rail
IMO one of the easiest ways for people with money to end up with no money is to over spend on cars. They are also the ones most likely to be complaining about how broke they are despite having a good pay cheque.“Trains are for poor people.” (In the U.S.)
IMO one of the easiest ways for people with money to end up with no money is to over spend on cars.
To be fair, I can’t blame people for being very accepting of taking the train but not bussing, and this goes back to someone else’s comment in this thread about the new park’n’ride significantly boosting ridership on the LRT extension. A train allows you to avoid inclement road conditions and traffic while offering a much smoother and faster ride, and can feel superior to driving. The bus does not, with the added disadvantages of unreliable and infrequent schedules, extra stops and you’re still stuck with sharing space with other people. The park’n’ride will be a boon for the LRT, like it was at Century Park until 2014. Plus, the land use makes sense. It’s in the TUC and near a major pipeline corridor, so high-density development just isn’t possible.Similarly, I had a slightly snooty friend's wife tell me in Vancouver that of course he'd take the Skytrain, but NOT the bus because...shudder.
Also: LRT stations, even the more open air ones, are much more pleasant to wait at than most bus stops in this city.To be fair, I can’t blame people for being very accepting of taking the train but not bussing, and this goes back to someone else’s comment in this thread about the new park’n’ride significantly boosting ridership on the LRT extension. A train allows you to avoid inclement road conditions and traffic while offering a much smoother and faster ride, and can feel superior to driving. The bus does not, with the added disadvantages of unreliable and infrequent schedules, extra stops and you’re still stuck with sharing space with other people. The park’n’ride will be a boon for the LRT, like it was at Century Park until 2014. Plus, the land use makes sense. It’s in the TUC and near a major pipeline corridor, so high-density development just isn’t possible.
Yes, some are even heated, partly enclosed or more sheltered, which probably matters more in a place like Canada where we can have some very cold days, unlike the more moderate climate in much of the US.Also: LRT stations, even the more open air ones, are much more pleasant to wait at than most bus stops in this city.
Wow and the crosswalks in three corners don't even deliver you all the way to a sidewalk. I can see your point.
Would right turn signals help solve the problem?