kEiThZ
Superstar
Perhaps. Some countries include their federal law enforcement in their NATO contribution but I'm don't the legal details.
Part of the problem is some people think it would be as simple as bolting a machine gun or launcher on an icebreaker or buoy tender and calling it 'defence'. It's a lot more complicated than that.
The public is generally ignorant on all this anyway. I don't think it matters.
What's important for our government is what the NATO partners who are suddenly important to us think. And there's varying levels of interest there on enforcing the hard definition.
A huge part of why we've gotten a pass for so long, honestly comes down to our people. An experienced Canadian Captain can be more skilled and knowledgeable than a Major or Lt. Col from other countries. And so we have used people to offset the lack of capability, to retain our credibility. But now that we're breaking people and kit, we're running up on the limits of this strategy. But as long as we continue to send folks that NATO values, and work on recapitalization in the general direction, we'll get a pass. I expect to get to 2%. I don't think we'll going to 3% or whatever the talk is these days.