Same page. I've never really felt strong appeal for candidates who veer away from the centre.
But here we now face attempts to redefine the centrist candidate as a right-wing extremist. And therein lies the dispute.
Yes, this.
I guess it's easy to blame the Fords for sending the whole damn city off-kilter.
I have a friend or two who are die-hard Olivia folks and a friend or two who wouldn't vote for her with guns to their heads.
IMHO, what I've seen in this campaign is the former group just losing all perspective. Tory is a classic 'Progressive Conservative,' much closer to Bill Davis than Rob Ford (who, I'll betcha, couldn't even tell you who Davis was). Fine, he's not Barbara Hall or John Sewell but people like Linda McQuaid are painting him as an extremist and is utterly untrue and easily disproven.
I feel bad saying Chow supporters are acting like Ford Nation, irrational and unreachable, but that's what I've been seeing.
The point of an election if to have people choose between competing visions of the city , putting Doug's "uniqueness" aside, that's what we're getting. I think Chow and Ford aren't nearly as far apart as her supporters would like to think but, yes, he is more 'conservative' and she is more 'progressive.' For a combination of reasons people are opting (it seems) for the 'conservative' candidate but ath doesn't mean they're opting more Fordesque policies. I think the city needs higher taxes, better transit planning etc. but Chow hasn't grabbed that bull by the horns, so this is what she gets by trying to play their game.
The main thing, after getting rid of the Fords, is bridging some of the social wedges they have driven in the city. I may be naive but I think Tory is capable of doing it. I hope that Chow Nation won't be sore losers, obstructionists who prevent us from finally moving forward.