News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.9K     0 

IanO

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
13,565
Reaction score
40,922
Interesting intensity.

Full EDC pack.

Screenshot 2026-05-11 at 12.11.36 PM.png
Screenshot 2026-05-11 at 12.11.43 PM.png
Screenshot 2026-05-11 at 12.11.58 PM.png
 
Consequences would include entrances mostly opening to the parking lot.
Which would of course unfortunately defeat the purpose of having the businesses right along the street where the front doors would be best for pedestrians. Very few businesses like to have two ways in and out of their businesses for customers.
 
Its almost like people could just... walk 30 steps from the parking lot around the building to the front :eek: Sounds so easy to me yet developers seem to disagree lol
 
Which would of course unfortunately defeat the purpose of having the businesses right along the street where the front doors would be best for pedestrians. Very few businesses like to have two ways in and out of their businesses for customers.

For the life of me, I can't remember where it was, but I was at a building like this once (not in Edmonton) that had a hallway built down the middle that went from the back parking lot, through the building to the street side. It made it easy and quick to get from the parking lot to the front, and within the hallway space were public washrooms and maintenance closets. There were no entrances to the businesses from the parking lot side, just the single entrance that brought you out to the front.
 
For the life of me, I can't remember where it was, but I was at a building like this once (not in Edmonton) that had a hallway built down the middle that went from the back parking lot, through the building to the street side. It made it easy and quick to get from the parking lot to the front, and within the hallway space were public washrooms and maintenance closets. There were no entrances to the businesses from the parking lot side, just the single entrance that brought you out to the front.
No washrooms or maintenance closets but this is the setup for the businesses north of Jasper Ave between 112 & 113st. If there’s going to be a parking lot I think it’s a great design
 
109 Street south of Whyte Ave is one of the few main roads in the central part of the city that has more residential than commercial along it.

So I suppose this development will fill a gap here and it looks nicer than the typical strip malls along our main roads.

However, I wish it it was not just one floor and had residential or offices above. That would be mixed use and would be better for the area.
 
From my lens I have no idea how this makes any sense financially. Simple math - just calculate the annual potential income and apply a value cap rate and work it back.

Potential Annual Income - $201k (assume $38/SF base rent x 5292 SF leasable)
Potential stabilized value @7% cap (est. cap based on non-anchored strip retail) = $2.871M

Construction cost for this type of commercial build will be +/-$245/SF = $1.296M
Land = $900k (assumed)
Total hard costs = $2.196M.
Not including soft costs either.

Conclusion - no juice from this. Any equity put in is stuck until it's sold and even then, your returns are low. Even to achieve the exit value a lot has to go right. This location, while on a great high traffic corridor, isn't the best or highest demand so the ability to command the higher face rates to offset construction costs becomes a challenge, especially when competing with existing product in the area for less. I have been involved in some crazy deals in my career but I wouldn't take this one on in its current form.
 

Back
Top