Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Calendar
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
VIVA + York Region Transit
.
North York Centre and Vaughan Metropolitan Centre are decent examples. Hopefully more of those two can happen. (Albeit I would prefer...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
cplchanb's post
in the thread
VIVA + York Region Transit
with
Like
.
Many laughed at this: https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/chongqing-china-metro-station-nowhere/index.html However look how it...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
GO Transit Electrification | Metrolinx
.
That's very possible. Still, nothing wrong with retiring them, instead of refurbishing (for an Nth time).
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
Thaboss's post
in the thread
Alto - High Speed Rail (Toronto-Quebec City)
with
Like
.
I'm shocked...assuming this reporting is true they are making life alot harder to appease kingston. The timing of this leak with the...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
Union Station Rail Corridor Improvements
.
The way they're going about this, it seems they're only expanding Union's capacity to reach a barebones "15-minute" service by...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
crs1026's post
in the thread
Union Station Rail Corridor Improvements
with
Like
.
I am told that some of the newer signal bridges in USRC that are as yet not cut in, and sit with their targets covered, will be torn...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
TRONto's post
in the thread
Union Station Rail Corridor Improvements
with
Like
.
That aligns with this...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
Northern Light's post
in the thread
Union Station Rail Corridor Improvements
with
Like
.
Relevant portion from above:
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
WB62's post
in the thread
Union Station Rail Corridor Improvements
with
Like
.
This is of interest too, Metrolinx has indicted that third parties may affect future plans for the Union Station Rail corridor platform...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
GO Transit Electrification | Metrolinx
.
No single city would buy all of them, but several cities could buy some. So GO can recover some money instead of just scrapping surplus...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
GO Transit Electrification | Metrolinx
.
No I am not. We assume some amount of cars, @taylortbb suggested 100 per year, will arrive with a 5 year lead time, over 10-15 years...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
leopetr's post
in the thread
GO Transit Electrification | Metrolinx
with
Like
.
https://www.thetrillium.ca/news/municipalities-transit-and-infrastructure/metrolinx-writes-off-more-than-500m-in-upgrades-cuts-go-expansi...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
drum118's post
in the thread
Waterfront Transit Reset Phase 1 Study
with
Love
.
First of all, let it be clear that there is no $3 Billion to build this line and it will be lucky if it see $1 Billion. The other $2...
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
H4F33Z's post
in the thread
Waterfront Transit Reset Phase 1 Study
with
Wow
.
Or wait, hear me out:
Jun 22, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
ssiguy2's post
in the thread
Waterfront Transit Reset Phase 1 Study
with
Like
.
This makes a LOT more sense than than this little streetcar costing a numbing $3 billion. It would be rapid transit which this little...
Jun 22, 2026
Members
Back
Top