Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Calendar
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
U
urbanclient
reacted to
crs1026's post
in the thread
Alto - High Speed Rail (Toronto-Quebec City)
with
Like
.
I am normally not a fan of value engineering, but in the case of Alto I hope it is happening, and we UTers might want to keep those...
May 3, 2026
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
Alto - High Speed Rail (Toronto-Quebec City)
.
Good news, as I've hinted previously, only ~200 km out of the 600 km section from Toronto to Montreal needs to be at 300 km/h design...
May 3, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
dullturtle06's post
in the thread
Roads: Ontario/GTA Highways Discussion
with
Like
.
Most people in Toronto don't want the 413. Its the premier's pet project that sucked up all the highway funding from all across the...
May 3, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
Bojaxs's post
in the thread
Alto - High Speed Rail (Toronto-Quebec City)
with
Like
.
The 413 freight bypass for CPKC. (CN would use the 407 freight bypass) I originally proposed it for the intention of taking CPKC trains...
May 3, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
Frank_Lee's post
in the thread
Alto - High Speed Rail (Toronto-Quebec City)
with
Like
.
I don't know where you're getting this data from (clearly not here, which is the best existing source on high speed rail costs). For...
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
zang's post
in the thread
PM Mark Carney's Canada
with
Like
.
No, but as airports are federally regulated simply tell the province expansion isn't allowed. It makes expropriation moot. Aside from...
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
PM Mark Carney's Canada
.
There is precedence for this:
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
zang's post
in the thread
PM Mark Carney's Canada
with
Like
.
Why would saying "no" to airport expansion cause a constitutional crisis?
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
RapidTO: Master Thread
.
To play devil's advocate, a single lane in each direction is frustrating even with light traffic. If you can't pass cars that are...
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
SubHuman's post
in the thread
RapidTO: Master Thread
with
Like
.
I think a lot of the car-brains must be people who just like to complain. I knew someone who was like that. Driving into downtown...
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
replied to the thread
PM Mark Carney's Canada
.
Misinformation again. All airports are under federal jurisdiction, even if the airport in question isn't wholly owned by the federal...
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
nightstreak's post
in the thread
King Street (Streetcar Transit Priority)
with
Like
.
This right here is the smoking gun for what we've observed on King Street. Cops don't enforce laws they don't like and too many of them...
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
Erich Nelson's post
in the thread
Alto - High Speed Rail (Toronto-Quebec City)
with
Like
.
Going back to Toronto's second urban station - I overlaid the CPKC alignment onto Toronto's Future Rapid Transit map to see what an...
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
nightstreak's post
in the thread
PM Mark Carney's Canada
with
Like
.
Seeing Carney not only allowing Doug Ford to trample all over Toronto and take over our airport and waterfront parks, but joining in...
May 2, 2026
U
urbanclient
reacted to
kotsy's post
in the thread
Toronto
Toronto | Ontario Line 3 | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx
with
Like
.
The TBM finally moved forward! It hadn't moved after 4 or earlier because I checked back around 8 and it was in the same position...
May 2, 2026
Members
Back
Top